Fifty Shades of Gray

Blog Category: 
Doll Type: 

"Fifty Shades of Gray"

"As Reported by Dollyforme"

Yea – another really crappy movie. Hey – this garbage is in the theatres and sadly, couples went to see this crap on Valentine’s day. This movie is yet another waste of time and money – don’t go see it or above all – take someone else with you if you do.

Let’s cut to the chase on this one: If you are going into Fifty Shades of Grey expecting an original plot you are in a big disappointment - for this movie has just the usual wish-fulfillment fairy tale plot of a naive girl and her Prince Charming that's been told a million times before. And much better too.

Based on an obscure novel by E L James, Fifty Shades is the story of Anastasia Steele (an entirely legitimate name), an English Lit major at Washington State, a clumsy plain Jane, and, no big deal, a virgin. Subbing for her sick roommate, she’s interviewing the millionaire Christian Grey (Dornan) for her school newspaper, a man who’s made his money manufacturing things that aren’t important to the story and, also, feeding poor people.

The spark that alights from that interview carries over into a courtship that seems to be bound for romance. That is, until he drops an exhaustive contract into Anastasia’s lap that details his predilection as a dominant and his desire to see her as his submissive, and will she just sign please so the flogging may commence?

Snark aside, the first half of the film is pretty entertaining. It has a campy, nimble approach to the material that elevates it above its fanfic origins. Dakota Johnson breathes life into an otherwise drippy, clueless character. She is absolutely the best thing about this movie. Dornan, as Grey, on the other hand, does not fare as well. As written, his character is icy and taciturn, which means you’re in for a lot of pursed lips, eye twitches, and severe looks, and not much else (except, perhaps, his abs).

That the couple's chemistry is nonexistent also doesn't help sell the story. Soap opera stars have much better chemistry.

But once Christian introduces Anastasia to his wealthy lifestyle, the rest of the film plays out like some forgotten Calvin Klein perfume ad mixed with an S&M legal drama about butt plugs (Anastasia’s never heard of them) and other similarly complex legal ramifications of things (maybe fists) you stick into other things, with excursions in helicopters, lavish penthouse suites, and of course, red rooms of bondage.

The subversive undercurrent at work here – that Anastasia holds the real power over Christian because she actually loves him as a person and will eventually change him for the better – ends up not being that subversive after all. It's a bondage movie without much perversion, a love story without much passion, and ultimately, a film burdened with expectations it could never fulfill. It never quite hits as hard as you want it to.

Anyway, if you want to see a young pretty girl get the crap beat out of her, this is your movie – and for two hours too.

So – not worth watching – and not worth renting either. Two thumbs down bigtime.

Comments

Not-wealthy, smart,  but naive girl seduced by a way too much wealthy young handsome bloke with a fetish....

I wonder what the story would have looked like if the bloke was not young, handsome and smart and stupendishly rich, but just an ordinary man with a fetish. Would it then still be a hit? At least that would have been a challenge to write.

Koen

I totally agree with Dollyforme: not worth a nickle!

 

Interesting review. My girlfriend gave me the book as a Birthday gift. Still to read once I settle in to my new home, wherever & whenever that may be. I will probably waste my nickel just to see what all the fuss is about. BDSM circles despise the 50 Shades depiction of BDSM.

I haven't read the book and the reviews weren't good on it. As for the film, well again, really bad reviews :(.

I'll wait until it's on my Sky movie channels and then make my mind up.

Great review though :).

Kharn

CoverDoll Publisher To err is human to forgive divine.